|India · Pakistan · Bangladesh
Have documents? Expose the hidden →
Home / Standards
Evidence classification

Six labels. No ambiguity.

Every statement we publish carries one of these classes, so readers can see exactly how strong the evidence is.

Documented fact

Established by records

Supported by primary documents: filings, judgments, gazettes, registries or official statements.

Reported allegation

Claimed, not proven

Made by a named party or earlier publication. Attributed, never presented as fact.

Investigative lead

Worth examining

A pattern or connection that warrants inquiry. Not a finding and not an accusation.

Analysis

Interpretation

Our reasoning about documented facts, with the method and limitations shown.

Unverified claim

Could not confirm

Published only where the claim itself is newsworthy, and clearly flagged as unconfirmed.

Editorial conclusion

Our judgment

A reasoned position the editors take on the evidence, signed off at the highest editorial level.

STANDING RULEThe presence of a person, company or institution in our databases does not by itself imply wrongdoing.
Editorial workflow

Verification is the product.

Nine stages between a tip and a published story. Two of them — fact-check and right of response — can never be skipped.

01Submitted
02Initial review
03Source assessment
04Evidence review
05Fact check
06Right of response
07Editorial approval
08Published
09Updates & corrections

Right of response

Anyone named in our reporting is contacted with the specific findings before publication, and given reasonable time to reply.

  • Date and method of contact
  • Response deadline
  • Response received — published in full or fairly summarised
  • No-response status recorded

Corrections

Errors are corrected openly. Every material change is dated and explained on the story itself and in a public log.

  • Original publication date
  • Correction date and explanation
  • Updated source, where relevant
  • No silent material changes
Editorial disclaimer

Faujileaks is an investigative research and publishing platform. Information is evaluated using publicly available records, documents and other lawful sources. The presence of a person, company, institution or relationship in our databases does not by itself imply wrongdoing. Allegations are distinguished from verified facts, and subjects are given an opportunity to respond where appropriate.